Why Okeechobee County is now Medium risk
Risk dropped from 81 (Very High) to 46 (Medium) on April 23, 2026 after the Okee-One project was canceled and the "Special Technology Opportunity Centers" comp plan amendment was struck. Underlying physical factors — rural land availability, moderate power infrastructure, stressed water — are unchanged. Current exposure from active projects dropped to near zero.
Moderate in-county generation. Viable for mid-sized facilities, extension required for hyperscale.
South Florida Water Management District — Everglades restoration, high demand, significant water stress.
Very rural. Abundant large parcels available for industrial conversion — the profile developers prefer.
Okee-One canceled April 23, 2026. Comp plan "Special Technology Opportunity" framework removed. Small residual exposure reflects the county's underlying attractiveness to developers should a new proposal emerge.
The facts, as filed.
A public project, a state walkback, and a community that won.
Indian River State College — a public institution serving the Treasure Coast — is proposing Okee-One as a hybrid facility: both an operating data center and a learning laboratory for students in technology, cybersecurity, electrical systems, welding, and HVAC programs. College spokesperson Howard Matzner has described the project as a workforce development initiative, framing it around career pathways for Okeechobee residents and hands-on learning opportunities for students.
The proposed 9–10 MW capacity is roughly 5% the size of Palm Beach County's Project Tango. At that scale, Okee-One is closer to a mid-size traditional data center than a hyperscale facility. College officials have said they are working to identify operating partners who will align with the educational mission. The project received a $1.5 million grant from Gov. DeSantis's administration, which is the funding that brought it to public attention.
The site is unusual. The 205-acre parcel was once the Florida School for Boys at Okeechobee, a state reform school where children were subjected to documented physical abuse by state employees. The emotional weight of that history has shaped early public comment periods: some residents have welcomed the idea of converting the site into workforce training infrastructure, while others have questioned whether a data center is the right use of land with this history. The site is being reclaimed, regardless of what gets built there. What gets built — and by whom — is the open question.
At the April 2026 Okeechobee County Board of Commissioners meeting, about seven residents spoke against the proposal. A woman named Lee said: "What's in it for us? I have been doing some reading on my own and I have concerns about expansion plans for the center once it's done. Are we attempting to draw in more tech industry to the area? Let alone the electrical concerns... I don't see an upside." Another resident said she was there for her children: "I'm mostly just here for my children to say that, just keep in mind the impacts that we're making on the environment and the humans that live nearby these things."
The state reversal. On April 22, 2026, the Tampa Bay Times published reporting based on exchanges with the DeSantis administration, in which Florida Commerce Secretary J. Alex Kelly said the state was misled about the scale and nature of the project. The administration, which provided the $1.5 million grant from the Rural Infrastructure Fund in March 2025, now says it is declining to provide further funding. This is the same Commerce Secretary who, days earlier, sent a public letter to Fort Meade calling that city's hyperscale approval "fundamentally flawed." The state has now publicly positioned itself against both of the most visible 2026 Florida data center proposals.
College response. Indian River State College has disputed the characterization. A college representative, Moore, said in public comment: "We've honored everything the state has asked us to do. If commerce has decided to go in another direction, that's news to me." College spokesperson Howard Matzner has continued to emphasize the workforce training mission. The project is, at its core, a partnership between the college and the state for workforce development; the walk-back in state funding raises the question of whether the college will continue absent that partner.
The Treadwell connection. Reporting by the Tampa Bay Times describes how the project originated. Andrew Treadwell, IRSC's head of government and community relations, said his involvement came from a personal connection: his brother Raymond Treadwell previously served as chief deputy general counsel to Gov. DeSantis and was later appointed by the governor to the First District Court of Appeal. Andrew Treadwell has also said that Secretary Kelly personally introduced IRSC leaders to "someone very high up on the Nvidia chain." Nvidia did not respond to press inquiries. These disclosures — while not necessarily improper on their face — explain how a $1.5 million grant moved to a rural college project without broader visibility, and they are central to why the administration's walk-back is politically consequential.
The petition. Tampa-area resident Wyatt Deihl, who grew up in Okeechobee, started a petition opposing the project. It collected 500 signatures in its first day and stands at approximately 3,000 signatures — notable in a town whose population is around 5,500. Deihl has publicly said the town is too small and too rural for a project of this character.
The county's legal position. Because the parcel is controlled by a public educational institution, Okee-One is exempt from the standard county permitting and rezoning process. County spokesperson Jarret Romanello has said that while the commissioners have received updates on the project's progress, the county is not expected to take any binding votes on it — the county has no approval authority over the project. This is the single largest procedural difference between Okee-One and other Florida data center fights.
How we got here.
For Okeechobee County residents.
How the project was defeated
The cancellation is the end point of a trajectory that accelerated over roughly six weeks: a resident petition that reached 3,000 signatures (55% of the town of Okeechobee's population) in a community not known for organized activism; persistent public comment pressure at April county commission meetings; and a coincidence of timing with Florida Commerce Secretary J. Alex Kelly's parallel criticism of the Fort Meade hyperscale approval in Polk County. By April 22, the DeSantis administration was on record that it had been misled about the project. By April 23, the project was canceled and the comp plan amendment that would have supported future data centers was struck. The organizing lesson — small town, 3,000 signatures, aggressive public comment, sympathetic state officials — is now a template.
What's still on the ground
The physical profile that made Okeechobee attractive to developers hasn't changed: 205 acres of state-controlled land at the former School for Boys site remains, adjacent to high-voltage infrastructure and agricultural-classified land. The Rural Infrastructure Fund that originally allocated the $1.5 million still exists. The state college that initiated the project still holds the land. Residents who led the opposition will need to stay alert for revived or successor proposals — same site, different developer, different framing.
The precedent
Okeechobee is the first Florida hyperscale-adjacent project canceled by direct state action after resident pressure. Sentinel Grove in St. Lucie was withdrawn by its developer in February; Project Tango in Palm Beach County was postponed from April 23 to July 15 at the developer's request. Okee-One is different — the state that originally funded it publicly pulled its backing and then canceled it. The signal to other Florida developers: community opposition combined with state-level pressure is now a real risk factor, not just noise.
The site history
The former Florida School for Boys at Okeechobee operated as a state reform school where children faced physical abuse by state employees. The emotional and political weight of the site will shape any use of it. Survivors and their families have been consulted on some reclamation projects at the separate, better-known Dozier School for Boys site in Marianna. Whether any similar consultation process is built into Okee-One's planning is not publicly clear as of mid-April 2026.
Why the county can't stop it
Because the parcel is controlled by a public educational institution, the project is exempt from Okeechobee County's standard permitting and rezoning authority. This is structurally different from every other Florida data center fight on this site: in Palm Beach, Polk, Nassau, and elsewhere, the county commission has direct vote authority. In Okeechobee, the county does not. That shifts the meaningful leverage to three other venues — the state (via funding and administrative pressure), the college itself (via direct engagement with IRSC leadership and the Board of Trustees), and media and political attention.
Reporting we relied on.
- Tampa Bay Times — April 22, 2026 investigation on the DeSantis administration's reversal, state funding withdrawal, and Treadwell connection
- WFLX / WPTV — April 2026 Board of Commissioners meeting coverage, resident interviews
- Okeechobee County Board of Commissioners — meeting minutes, agendas, spokesperson Jarret Romanello's statements on county authority
- Indian River State College — official statements from spokesperson Howard Matzner; February 2026 presentation by Andrew Treadwell
- South Florida Regional Planning Council — regional data center proposal tracking
- Florida Department of Commerce — Secretary J. Alex Kelly's public statements on state funding position
- Petition organized by Wyatt Deihl — signature count and organizing
Okee-One is dead. The 205 acres aren't.
Indian River State College still owns the site. The Rural Infrastructure Fund still exists. The structural conditions that attracted this project — high-voltage infrastructure, rural land, state support — are all still in place. The residents who prepared first won this round. The residents who prepare now will shape what comes next.
Your Okeechobee Defense Kit is the playbook that worked this time, written for your address and your specific concerns — your family's health (diesel backup generators, air quality), your well water, the 24/7 industrial noise and light, your property value, your FPL bill. It includes a Preparation Brief on how to read what's coming, a pre-drafted public comment letter you can adapt to whatever shows up next, a 2-minute hearing script, the commissioner and IRSC Board contact map, the public records requests that broke Okee-One open, and what Florida's 2026 data center laws (SB 484, HB 1007) mean for your property.
$39. Delivered in 60 seconds.
$39 · Delivered in 60 seconds · 180-day permanent link
More on what data centers mean for Florida residents
- Water usage & aquifer impact
- Well water contamination
- Your FPL / Duke / electric bill
- Industrial noise & decibels
- Property value impact
- Health risks & air quality
- Is one near my home?
- HOA & deed restrictions
- Selling a home near a data center
- How to find a proposal
- County commission hearings
- Writing a public comment letter
- How communities stop data centers
- Data centers coming to Florida
- What is a hyperscale data center?